|
July 29, 2002
Washington Targets Colombia's Rebels
by Garry Leech
Last week, the U.S. Congress approved a $28.9 billion counterterrorism
bill that includes $35 million in funding for Colombia. While the
aid will supposedly be used to combat all three Colombian armed
groups that are on the U.S. State Department's list of foreign terrorist
organizations, U.S. officials have clearly singled out the rebel
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) as "the most
dangerous international terrorist group based in this hemisphere."
Once signed into law, the counterterrorism bill will also eliminate
conditions that currently restrict U.S. drug aid to Colombia to
counternarcotics programs, allowing the military aid that constitutes
more than 70 percent of the $1.3 billion Plan Colombia and $625
million Andean Regional Initiative programs to be used for counterinsurgency
operations. Additionally, Washington recently announced that it
is placing a $5 million bounty on the heads of guerrilla leaders
and intends to implement a scheme to publish their names and photos
on food packages and matchbooks. Meanwhile, reports have also surfaced
regarding a possible military intervention against Colombia's leftist
guerrillas by a U.S.-led multinational force.
Despite
repeated claims by U.S. officials during Congressional hearings
in 2000 for the Clinton administration's $1.3 billion contribution
to Plan Colombia that the huge aid package did not signify an expansion
of U.S. military involvement in Colombia beyond the drug war, the
mission creep that critics warned of has now occurred. In reality,
Colombia's counterterrorism aid far exceeds the stated $35 million
in the new counterterrorism bill. When the $1.3 billion Plan Colombia
and the $625 million Andean Regional Initiative aid packages, which
can now be used against Colombia's illegal armed groups, are taken
into account, the amount of counterterrorism aid going to Colombia
totals more than $2 billion over a three year period. Additionally,
the Federal budget for the 2003 fiscal year contains $98 million
in U.S. aid that will be used to train and equip an elite Colombian
army battalion whose primary mission will be to protect Los Angeles-based
Occidental Petroleum's 490-mile Caño Limon oil pipeline,
which has been repeatedly bombed by the rebels.
While the aid is supposed to be used against all three illegal
armed groups that are on the State Department's list of foreign
terrorist organizations--the FARC, a smaller leftist guerrilla group
known as the National Liberation Army (ELN), and a right-wing paramilitary
militia called the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC)--most
of the anti-terrorist rhetoric from U.S. officials has clearly focused
on the FARC as Washington's principal enemy in Colombia.
Some 70 percent of the more than $2 billion in counterterrorism
aid is going to a Colombian military that is closely-allied with
one of the groups Washington itself considers a terrorist organization:
the AUC (incidentally, leaders of the coalition of regional paramilitary
groups recently announced they are disbanding the AUC and are looking
into establishing a new national paramilitary organization). This
right-wing paramilitary force consists of 10,000 fighters who are
responsible for 75 percent of Colombia's human rights abuses, including
a huge majority of the country's massacres. The strong ties between
the Colombian Armed Forces and the paramilitaries have helped preserve
a corrupt social, political and economic system in Colombia that
is closely aligned to U.S. political and economic interests in the
region.
In contrast to the AUC's essentially pro-U.S. stance, the FARC
has specifically targeted U.S. economic interests in Colombia through
its criticism of the U.S.-dominated economic globalization process
and bombings of oil pipelines used by U.S. corporations. Consequently,
it is the FARC who are the principal targets on Washington's terrorist
hit list.
Every penny of the $35 million in new counterterrorism aid is earmarked
for use against the FARC and the ELN or to protect those sectors
of society targeted by the rebels. Some $25 million of the aid is
to be used to prevent kidnapping, a tactic that the leftist guerrillas
use to help fund their insurgencies. Another $4 million is to be
used to fortify police stations against rebel attacks, while the
remaining $6 million is for immediate protection of Occidental's
Caño Limon pipeline.
The
counterterrorism aid is not being used to target the paramilitaries
or to protect their victims. According to human rights organizations,
the AUC is responsible for the majority of the following atrocities:
the forced displacement of more than two million Colombians from
their homes and land; massacres that have taken the lives of thousands
of peasants over the past few years (there were more than 400 massacres
in 2000 alone); the assassination of more than 3,800 union leaders
over the past 15 years without a single culprit ever being convicted.
While the paramilitaries are the principal perpetrators of these
human rights abuses, many of them have been committed with the collaboration,
and sometimes direct participation, of the U.S.-backed Colombian
military.
While there are plans to use some U.S. funds to create a special
security unit to target paramilitary leaders, according to Amnesty
International it is nothing more than "cynical window dressing."
The human rights group claims that the Colombian military already
knows where the paramilitaries are located, "The sites of paramilitary
bases are frequently known to the security forces and are often
located in the immediate vicinity of military bases" and that
"military units continue to carry out operations in coordination
with paramilitaries."
Instead of protecting the millions of impoverished Colombians who
are victims of right-wing terrorism, the Bush administration is
focusing on potential kidnapping victims (mostly upper and middle
class citizens targeted by the guerrillas because of their wealth
and their support for the existing political and economic system),
police officers stationed in rural towns targeted by the rebels
(unlike in most countries, the militaristic Colombian National Police
is administered by the Department of Defense), and protecting the
risky foreign business investments of a U.S. corporation by defending
the Caño Limon oil pipeline.
In yet another display of the political bias behind Washington's
Colombian engagement, two Colombian television networks--RCN and
Caracol--revealed last week that the United States has placed a
bounty of $5 million on the heads of FARC and ELN leaders as part
of its global counterterrorism strategy. Additionally, the Bush
administration is seeking to implement a campaign in Colombia in
which the names and photos of guerrilla leaders would be placed
on posters, food packages and matchboxes. However, despite their
purportedly equal status on the State Department's terrorist list,
there was no mention of a reward for paramilitary leaders or the
adorning of food packages with mug shots of notorious AUC militia
bosses like Carlos Castaño and Salvatore Mancuso.
Also last week, a Brazilian newspaper revealed plans to create
a U.S.-led multinational military force to combat Colombia's guerrilla
groups. Citing the Brazilian Defense Ministry and comments made
by a Chilean army colonel, José Miguel Pizarro, the paper
Jornal do Brasil claimed that Chile's war academy has been
studying a plan since January that calls for 2,600 troops from the
United States, Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Ecuador and Peru to intervene
in Colombia's conflict under the auspices of the United Nations.
Colonel Pizarro claims that the intervention could take place in
January 2004 after incoming Colombian President Alvaro Uribe's military
offensive has placed the country's leftist rebels on the defensive.
While Ecuador, Chile and Uruguay have denied the existence of such
a plan, its similarity to previous proposals made by Washington
make it plausible. In recent years, the United States has lobbied
unsuccessfully in the Organization of American States (OAS) to establish
requirements that call on the regional body to create a multinational
force to intervene wherever democracy is threatened. But many Latin
American leaders are reluctant to agree to the U.S. proposal, fearful
that Washington is attempting to use the OAS as a means of legitimizing
direct military intervention in Colombia's civil conflict.
Clearly, the Bush administration's counterterrorism strategies
in Colombia are primarily targeting an armed group that is nothing
more than one of several armed actors in Colombia's civil conflict.
Furthermore, the hypocrisy so often evident in U.S. foreign policy
has never been more evident than in the recent decision to target
one Colombian terrorist group--the FARC--by implementing strategies
that clearly aid another more brutal terrorist organization--the
AUC. None of the Colombian groups designated by Washington as terrorists
possess an international agenda or reach comparable to that of Al
Qaeda, nor is there any evidence that they constitute any direct
threat to the United States or its citizens. In fact, to the contrary,
it just so happens that the tactics utilized by Colombia's most
brutal terrorist force serve U.S. political and economic interests
in the region.
This article originally appeared
in Colombia Report, an online journal
that was published by the Information Network of the Americas (INOTA).
Back to Top .
Comments
Copyright © 2003 Colombia
Journal. All rights reserved.
|