|
August 12, 2002
Colombian Official Speaks Out Against Rebel
Threats and Plan Colombia
by Garry Leech
On the day that Alvaro Uribe was being sworn in as the new president
of Colombia, I met with one of the many local officials who have
been forced to flee for their lives as a result of rebel threats.
Lizet (who requested that her real name not be used for security
reasons) is the 25-year-old president of a local council in the
southern department of Putumayo. Like hundreds of other local officials
in Colombia, she has recently received an ultimatum from the rebel
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) to quit her post or
be killed. At first she ignored the threat, but eventually had to
flee the region. In the following interview, Lizet discusses the
rebel threats and the devastating consequences of Plan Colombia
from a hiding place far removed from her community.
Q:
What is your official position in Putumayo?
A: I am the president of the local council for the community
where I live in the Sibundoy Valley in upper Putumayo. I work with
the community and organizations, and I work with a foundation that
has 40 groups throughout Putumayo. I also work with the campesino
organization, ANUC.
Q: Why did you leave Putumayo?
A: I left Putumayo on July 28 because I have been persecuted
and threatened by the FARC. First of all, because of the work that
I have been doing. Secondly, because of the situation in the country.
The FARC is pressuring the government by threatening us through
letters and other things. They lost the zona de despeje and
didn't reach a negotiated settlement with the government, so the
war continues.
Q: Couldn't the army or the police protect you in Putumayo?
A: No, because they don't have enough men. There were only
26 police to protect our threatened communities. When I was first
threatened I thought that I didn't need protection because I didn't
think they would kill me. But in the last threat, a man came to
see me and I didn't know he was a guerrilla because he looked like
any other person in town. He asked me, "What are you going
to do? Are you going to leave or are you going to stay? Did you
resign?" I asked why he was asking all these questions, what
does he know and are the guerrillas near here? He asked if I thought
that guerrillas only came with arms, because he doesn't have arms
but could still be a guerrilla. "The guerrillas come with arms
when they are going to execute people," he said. "Your
life has been respected because of the people." He was there
and the police were close by, but I couldn't denounce him to them
because if I did, I knew the guerrillas would kill me. He said the
guerrillas are like any person you see on the corner. Anybody could
be a guerrilla. This makes the situation more difficult because
you can't trust anybody. Sometimes your best friends are guerrillas
or informers. It is very complicated.
Q: What are you doing while you are in hiding?
A: After I was threatened, I met with local councils from
four other towns to try and find a solution to this problem. The
guerrillas were forcing us to resign in order to save our lives
or become military targets. But the national government refused
to accept our resignations; they won't let us resign because the
government will lose its ability to govern if we do. We needed to
find alternatives and get guarantees from a government that has
abandoned the region. The government spends money in the highlands
where poppies are cultivated, but not throughout the region. But
we are also affected by the fumigation. More than 150 families,
mainly coca growers, that have been displaced from lower Putumayo
have moved to the Sibundoy Valley. A lot of people moving to upper
Putumayo are growing coca. We are trying to propose alternatives
for the people, and initially the government paid attention to us,
but they haven't done anything. At the moment everything is paralyzed
because local officials have been forced to leave. We proposed to
the government that the local councils work from outside the region
for a while so we can search for a solution without risking our
lives.
Q: Have you been threatened by the FARC since you went
into hiding?
A: It has been better here. I had a little problem when
I was in another place because information of my whereabouts leaked
out. But now I am very careful and I am in a place where no one
would expect to find me. I only talk to the people who are close
to me.
Q: Has the FARC installed new forms of government in
the communities that no longer have local officials?
A: The FARC think they are attacking the institution, but
they are attacking the people. It appears that the FARC has a proposal,
but I don't know the details yet, I have only heard rumors. They
have proposed that southern Colombia be separated from the rest
of the country. The FARC want to destroy the governmental structure
so that they can have a territory to control. They have tried to
implement their proposal in a small town, creating administrative
councils as a form of government. They have proposed that there
be a president of the administrative council, not a mayor, and that
half of the council consist of citizens and the other half of guerrillas.
The council will decide how things will work. The guerrillas propose
that in the small towns these Juntas de Accion Comunal (Community
Action Councils) act as leaders of the communities. But the councils
are not elected by popular vote, the FARC appoint the committee
leaders in every town. The guerrillas have proposed this as an alternative
solution, but they only want power. They are trying to do this in
the weakest places that have been abandoned by the national government,
where there is no army. In those places they can do what they want
and some of the people have received the guerrillas happily because
they are the only ones who bring justice.
Q:
What do you want the government to do in Putumayo?
A: On August 2, the government met with threatened mayors,
presidents of councils and governors to seek alternatives to the
current situation. But the government insists on investing more
money into fighting the war. But I don't think the government has
the capacity to fight a war. There are two actors: the FARC and
the paramilitaries. The FARC don't want the paramilitaries to exist
and they are not going to disappear while the paramilitaries exist.
And the paramilitaries are not going to disappear while the guerrillas
exist. We propose negotiations to find a solution because we civilians
can't attack the guerrillas with arms, because we don't have arms,
so we attack them with proposals. We want the guerrillas to talk
with us, and the government to talk with the guerrillas to look
for an alternative solution. But we don't want the guerrillas to
ask for a zona de despeje like before, because we tried that
and it didn't work.
There are many different ways to communicate, like the Internet,
and we want them to negotiate a solution where they stop the kidnappings,
make the humanitarian prisoner exchange, stop the attacks against
children, stop the bombs, don't kill more people, and don't declare
us military targets. They gave us 24 hours to leave and we will
give them 24 hours to talk and tell us exactly what they want. We
also don't know exactly what the position of the government is,
but we as people, and as a part of the government, ask that the
president begin a dialogue with the FARC instead of making war.
We have asked this of the government many times and we have also
sent a letter to the FARC saying we want negotiations and not war.
For many people war is the solution and the government buys more
planes and more arms to defeat the guerrillas because they think
the guerrillas are their biggest problem. The government doesn't
invest a lot of money in education, health, public services and
housing--only money for war. It is impossible for us. If the government
stops investing in employment, health and education it is like the
government is sacrificing our lives. If they escalate the war then
we will have three choices: we can go with the guerrillas, we can
go with the paramilitaries, or we can die of hunger with the government.
A lot of young people will join the guerrillas.
Q: Does your community have problems with the paramilitaries?
A: There are rumors that they have arrived in the area,
but there haven't been any attacks yet. But when the paramilitaries
came to lower Putumayo four years ago there was a lot of violence.
Everyone in the world knows they are the most violent. When they
came to Putumayo there were massacres and massacres and massacres.
They would castrate the men and cut the lips and arms off the women.
They would cut off the heads of young men and give them to their
mothers. The paramilitaries and the army are the same, they work
together. The army will leave a village so that the paramilitaries
can come in and massacre the people.
Q: What do you think is going to happen under President
Alvaro Uribe?
A: He has not really said what he intends to do. He has
proposed reducing the size of the Congress and dismissing lots of
government workers, but he doesn't see that he will increase the
unemployment by a high percentage. Thousands of government workers
will be unemployed and he doesn't have a solution for that, other
than jobs in the armed forces. The guerrillas are also waiting to
see if the government wants war or negotiations.
Q: What is the current situation in Putumayo regarding
Plan Colombia?
A: The agreements that have been made under Plan Colombia
have been experiments. The government said they were going to invest
a lot of money in Putumayo. They then proposed that campesinos who
make a living from growing four or five hectares change to palm
hearts, bananas and yucca. But we need the means to produce and
sell these products and the government didn't think about that.
So for Putumayo, Plan Colombia wasn't good. In fact, Plan Colombia
was the worst thing that could have happened to us. There was a
lot of corruption as NGOs from Bogotá invaded Putumayo. We
know how to work with the people in Putumayo, but with Plan Colombia
came a lot of people from Bogotá and other places to manage
the projects. The government only gives the money to these organizations.
The people who understand Putumayo don't have any money to implement
projects.
In some places they made good changes, but there were a lot of
bad experiences, like with palm production for example. Palm takes
two years to grow and the people aren´t going to stop producing
coca while they wait two years for the palm to grow. The people
take advantage of the alternative programs, but they are not going
to change permanently because the new crops take one or two years
to grow while coca only takes six months. Only a few people can
afford to switch from earning a million pesos (US$400) for coca
to 300,000 pesos (US$150) from alternative crops.
Q:
What problems have people experienced from the fumigation?
A: Nobody wanted the fumigation because of the biological consequences
to their health and the escalation of the conflict. It damaged the
land and the people. There are many photos of the damage that has
resulted from the fumigation. We have a lot of photos of children
with rashes on their faces that we have used in a protest against
Plan Colombia. We think it is necessary to solve the problem of
coca cultivation, but fumigation is not the right way.
If the government only implemented fumigation against farmers cultivating
coca it might be all right, but they attack other farmers too. They
don't see that the people who buy the coca are the problem. The
fumigation isn't attacking the narcotraffickers who buy the coca.
The cultivators are farmers just trying to survive. There are a
lot of narcotraffickers and they are now creating a second Putumayo.
Because of the situation, they are transferring coca cultivation
to Barbacoas and Llorente in Nariño and now there are fumigation
campaigns in those areas that have caused much damage. The departments
of Caquetá, Putumayo and Nariño have joined together
to protest against Plan Colombia because the medicine is worse than
the disease.
Q: Do you have family in Putumayo at this time?
A: Yes, it is very difficult for them because, initially,
I was threatened because of the work I do and I didn't want to quit
because it is my job. I did not want to leave two and a half years
behind. I have invested money, time and my life to do it. A lot
of farmers and indigenous people who have contact with the guerrillas
told them they didn't think it was fair to kill me. So I thought
that, because of the actions of local farmers and indigenous people,
I wasn't going to be killed. But when the guerrillas threatened
me and I didn't leave, they decided to threaten my family. They
thought that threatening to kill my family was a way to make me
leave. I thought that we could talk and I wanted to know why they
were threatening me and why I had to leave Putumayo, because we
had done a lot of good things and created work for the people. We
have developed strong organizations that have done good things.
But people who have contact with the guerrillas say that is why
I had to leave, because if I am not there then the people will be
forced to ask the government for assistance as there will be no
local officials to do things for them. I didn't want to risk my
life or the lives of other people. I know that if they threaten
to kill my family that they can do it. It is better that I get out
and try to work and protect myself from here or another country.
Q: What is the possibility of you and your family obtaining
asylum in another country?
A: There are some possibilities in other countries. There
is a program in Canada and another in Costa Rica, and I can go with
my family. But I don't want to leave the country. I want to stay
here because I can't leave everything I have done here. The government
said that I have to decide, because if I stay here they cannot protect
me and my family. We will see. If I leave, I hope that I can find
a country where I can still work for Colombia.
This article originally appeared
in Colombia Report, an online journal
that was published by the Information Network of the Americas (INOTA).
Back to Top .
Comments
Copyright © 2003 Colombia
Journal. All rights reserved.
|