|
September 30, 2002
Reinventing Carlos Castaño
by Garry Leech
The U.S. Justice Department timed its request for the arrest and
extradition of Colombian paramilitary chief Carlos Castaño
on drug trafficking charges to coincide with Colombian President
Alvaro Uribe's arrival in Washington. Undoubtedly, the White House
wanted to use the issuing of the extradition request and the "anti-terrorism"
pow-wow between President Bush and Uribe as evidence that Washington
and Bogotá are combating right-wing paramilitaries as well
as leftist guerrillas in Colombia. But while this charade was clearly
a public relations ploy, what's not so obvious is the reasoning
behind Castaño's announcement that he is willing to cooperate
with the extradition request and face justice in the United States.
One possible explanation is that the Bush administration has entered
into some kind of Faustian deal with Colombia's notorious death
squad leader.
Castaño,
a former army scout and associate of drug lord Pablo Escobar, took
over the reins of Colombia's largest paramilitary force, the Self-Defense
Forces of Córdoba and Urabá (ACCU), in 1994 after
his older brother Fidel disappeared. The ACCU and other regional
paramilitary groups in Colombia worked hand in glove with the U.S.-backed
Colombian military, which routinely provided them with intelligence,
weapons and transportation so they could effectively target suspected
rebel sympathizers including labor leaders, community organizers
and human rights activists. With funding from drug traffickers,
wealthy landowners, and the business community, Colombia's paramilitaries
grew dramatically during the 1990s from an estimated 850 paramilitary
fighters at the beginning of the decade to approximately 12,000
today. In 1997, Castaño oversaw the merging of the regional
paramilitary forces into one national organization, the United Self-Defense
Forces of Colombia (AUC).
AUC fighters routinely induced fear in the rural population by
entering villages and rounding up the residents in the town plaza.
They would then brutally kill a handful of villagers, often dismembering
them with machetes and chainsaws, before ordering the rest of the
people to leave the region. By forcibly displacing the rural population
in this manner, the paramilitaries hoped to eliminate local support
for the guerrillas. This strategy has aggravated the already grossly
inequitable distribution of arable lands as large landowners, as
well as multinational corporations interested in oil, coal and natural
gas resources, have taken over much of the abandoned land. More
than 2.5 million rural Colombians have been displaced by the conflict
in the past 15 years, many of them fleeing to the impoverished shantytowns
that are rapidly encircling many of Colombia's cities.
In recent years, however, Castaño has become increasingly
conscious of his organization's public image. The normally reclusive
militia chief has recently given several interviews to U.S. and
Colombian journalists. And in an attempt to gain political legitimacy,
the paramilitaries have begun implementing a strategy of selectively
assassinating one or two victims at a time over a prolonged period
instead of perpetrating a single large massacre. Because a massacre
is defined as three or more people killed at the same time, in the
same place, for the same reason, this tactic allows a smaller percentage
of Colombia's massacres to be attributed to the right-wing death
squads. It has also resulted in fewer negative news stories by media
organizations that often only deem mass killings to be newsworthy.
In an attempt to cleanse his personal image, Castaño resigned
from his position as the AUC's military commander in June 2001 in
order to distance himself from the atrocities regularly committed
by his fighters. He retained his position as political head of the
organization until one year later when, in another apparent public
relations ploy, Castaño announced he was dissolving the AUC
because of the inability of the national command to control the
drug trafficking activities and kidnappings committed by regional
paramilitary groups. Meanwhile, he has continued as commander of
Colombia's largest regional paramilitary force, the ACCU. It is
obvious that the limiting of massacres, Castaño's resignation
as the AUC's military chief, and the disbanding of the AUC are all
steps in an ongoing process intended to legitimize the paramilitary
leader.
But there are still two more obstacles to overcome before Castaño
can complete the reinvention of himself. One concerns the 27 warrants
for his arrest that have been issued by Colombian authorities. The
other involves human rights groups and a handful of representatives
in the U.S. Congress concerned about the atrocities committed by
the paramilitaries.
The sudden rise to power of President Uribe promises to take care
of the first obstacle. The process of politically legitimizing the
paramilitaries was initiated last week when Colombia's Interior
Minister Fernando Londoño introduced a proposal into the
Colombian Congress calling for the modification of an existing law
that will allow the government to conduct future peace talks with
illegal armed groups without giving them political status. If approved,
this would allow the Uribe administration to sidestep any objections
from human rights groups and civic organizations regarding the conferring
of political status upon the right-wing death squads. In all likelihood,
any such negotiations would lead to the issuing of an amnesty to
all paramilitaries willing to lay down their arms. Uribe could then
fulfill his campaign promise to strengthen the armed forces by immediately
recruiting these experienced fighters into the Colombian army, which
would allow the former paramilitaries to continue their dirty war
against suspected subversives.
While Uribe might get away with issuing an amnesty to rank and
file paramilitary fighters under the guise of disarming one of the
country's illegal armed groups, it is unlikely that international
human rights groups and the U.S. Congress would tolerate Castaño
being afforded such impunity. Which brings us to last week's extradition
request and Castaño's willingness to turn himself over to
U.S. authorities. In the past, the militia chief has made overtures
to U.S. law enforcement agencies regarding his willingness to cooperate
in the apprehension of Colombian drug traffickers. Consequently,
it is not inconceivable that somewhere along the line the U.S. Drug
Enforcement Agency (DEA) may have reached a deal with Castaño
that would allow him to turn state's evidence. In return for handing
the DEA a treasure trove of information about Colombian drug trafficking,
the death squad leader would be offered total impunity or an insignificant
amount of jail time.
Such a deal would be a win-win situation for everyone involved
except the Colombian people. Castaño will face "justice"
in the United States and might even be considered a hero in the
war against drugs. After appeasing Washington, he could then take
advantage of an amnesty offered by the Uribe administration. Ultimately,
a newly legitimized Castaño would be free to enter Colombia's
political arena. For its part, the DEA would be able to gloat about
what could conceivably be the largest drug trafficking coup ever,
albeit, most likely only consisting of drug traffickers affiliated
with renegade paramilitary factions not closely-allied to Castaño.
And Uribe would be able to point to the dismantling of the paramilitaries
as a step toward peace and proof that the guerrillas are responsible
for the country's violence. In the meantime, rural Colombians will
continue to be victimized by a dirty war that will have been legitimized.
Could the Bush administration possibly have entered into such a
Faustian deal with Castaño? History says yes. After all,
it is no more far-fetched an idea than the Kennedy administration
arming and training a group of Cuban exiles to try and overthrow
the Castro government. Nor is it any more inconceivable than the
Reagan administration secretly and illegally selling arms to Iran
in order to covertly fund CIA-trained counter-revolutionaries in
Nicaragua in direct violation of U.S. law. Nor is it any more absurd
than Bush Sr. invading Panama and killing some 4,000 civilians in
order to apprehend one alleged drug trafficker. And if the current
Bush administration can get away with launching a war against terrorism
by befriending a military dictatorship in Pakistan that supports
Kashmiri terrorists, then who's to say the White House can't help
legitimize Colombia's most notorious human rights abuser.
This article originally appeared
in Colombia Report, an online journal
that was published by the Information Network of the Americas (INOTA).
Back to Top .
Comments
Copyright © 2003 Colombia
Journal. All rights reserved.
|