|
June 25, 2000
An Interview with
FARC Commander Simón Trinidad
by Garry Leech
In January 1999, newly elected Colombian president Andres Pastrana
ceded an area of southern Colombia the size of Switzerland to the
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) guerrillas as part
of an agreement to begin peace talks. Although there is no cease-fire
agreement while the talks are being carried out, the Colombian Armed
Forces and the National Police have withdrawn all their forces from
the region known as the Zona de Despeje (Clearance Zone).
The
FARC's headquarters in Los Pozos, a small village located 18 miles
from San Vicente del Caguan in the Zona de Despeje, has been
host to the peace talks as well as public conferences where all
sectors of Colombian society can come to participate in discussions
about Colombia's future. On June 14, 2000, I traveled to Los Pozos
to interview Simón Trinidad, a FARC commander and a spokesman
for the guerrilla organization. Trinidad was a professor of economics
and a banker before joining the FARC 16 years ago.
Q. What is the current status of the ongoing peace process?
A. In May 1999, the FARC and the Colombian government established
a common agenda consisting of twelve points. This agenda was created
with an agreement that both parties would bring their proposals
to the negotiating table--things that they considered important
in the discussion and in the search for a resolution to the conflict
and to make the changes that Colombia needs.
At the moment, they are only discussing one item: unemployment.
There have been 13 or 14 public conferences here in Los Pozos about
this topic featuring businessmen, workers, university students,
teachers and rectors. This Friday there will be a conference with
the African-Colombian communities. On June 25 there will be a conference
with unemployed women and on June 29 there will be one on illicit
crops and the environment. The FARC and the government are discussing
all these items that they consider important in the search for a
political solution to the social conflict in Colombia.
Q. Why do you think the United States is focusing on the
FARC and campesinos that cultivate coca here in southern Colombia
instead of the paramilitaries and the narco-traffickers?
A. That's a good question. Because the FARC is the only political
organization that is in opposition to the Colombian oligarchy that
keeps Colombians in poverty, misery and a state of underdevelopment.
We are fighting for a change in the Colombian economic model and
for a new state. For a state that has at its center the men and
women of Colombia and to provide a better life and social justice
for Colombians. With the riches in this country and after 180 years
of republic living, Colombians must live better. We'll make better
use of the natural resources and provide jobs, healthcare, education
and housing so that 40 million Colombians can live well.
Who are those that are opposed to these social, economic and political
changes? They are the people who monopolize the riches and resources
in Colombia. A small group that monopolizes the banks, the industries,
the mines, agriculture and international commerce, including some
foreign companies, especially North Americans. For these reasons
we are the principal target in the war against narco-traffickers.
But we aren't narco-traffickers and the campesinos aren't narco-traffickers,
they are using it as an excuse for fighting against us.
If the United States government really intends to combat narco-traffickers,
all the people in Colombia know where the narco-traffickers live.
They live in Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla.
Therefore, to seize the narco-traffickers the police have to do
certain things. They have to leave their houses and search for them
in order to put them in prison. But no, they confront the poor campesino
with repression that not only hurts the illicit crops, but also
legal crops like yucca, bananas, and chickens and pigs because the
fumigation kills everything. It damages the earth, the vegetation,
the water and the animals.
Those responsible for making Colombia a producer of narcotics are
the people who have become rich from this business: the narco-traffickers,
and they are happy. Who else benefits from narco-trafficking? The
bankers and those who distribute the drugs in the cities, universities,
high schools and discos of North America, Europe and Asia, the greatest
consumers of marijuana, cocaine and heroin. Who else benefits? The
companies that make the chemicals for processing cocaine and heroin.
These companies are German and North American. They are industries
in the developed countries. It's a great business for the chemical
companies.
The poor campesino has lived in misery for many years and will continue
to do so. The war is for them and for us. We are planning a different
solution for the problem of narco-trafficking. It consists of providing
a better life for the poor campesino through agrarian reform, by
giving them good lands, technical assistance and low-interest loans
to change from growing illicit crops to legal crops; such as, coffee,
yucca, bananas, sugarcane and ranching. An alternative development
that facilitates commercialization for these products. But it's
a slow process to change them, it´s not just destroying the
illicit crops and then telling them to grow different ones. We have
to educate the campesinos about how to produce them. Give them tools,
credits and time so they can make a living from these crops and
become a different kind of campesino.
Q. Last year, FARC spokesman Raul Reyes claimed that the
FARC could eradicate coca cultivation in the regions it controls
in five years. However, there have been accusations that the FARC
is forcing campesinos to grow more coca here in the Zona de Despeje.
A. This is the story of the police, the army and the narco-traffickers.
We live in the country, and it is in the country that the coca,
marijuana and the poppy have been grown for thirty years. We know
that the campesinos grow illicit crops out of necessity. It is specifically
a socio-economic situation. They are obligated to cultivate illicit
crops because of a government that has neglected them for many years.
We have made it clear that we will not take the food out of the
mouth of the poor campesino. We will not leave them without jobs.
They work with the marijuana and coca leaf because they don't have
any other work. This problem is caused by the economic model of
the Colombian state, and it is the state that has to fix the problem.
We are the state's enemy, not their anti-narcotics police. The state
has to offer people employment, honest work, and social justice
to improve their lives.
Q. The FARC has introduced its own system of justice in
the Zona de Despeje. What are the codes of justice and how are they
implemented?
A. It's not true! We haven't introduced a justice system
in the Zona de Despeje. For 36 years we have been working to solve
the social problems of the campesinos that have a relationship with
us. For many years the state hasn't been present in many regions.
There have been no state judges, no justice system and no public
administration in many regions
of the country. The society has had to resolve their own problems
because they don't believe in the ministry of work, they don't believe
in Colombian justice, they don't believe in the Colombian army and
police. They came to us and we were there for them in the country.
For example, there was a conflict between two people regarding land
and cows. The cows belonging to one of them entered the other person's
land and destroyed his crops. He came to us looking for a solution
to this problem. They don't go looking for a state functionary because
they don't come to the country. So we told him to come here tomorrow
with his neighbor to talk about the problem. We listened to both
versions and we asked them for a solution. If they don't find a
solution, we propose some solutions in an attempt to apply justice.
We want to see that they can resolve their own problems. We are
a witness to their agreements.
Another example is a bad marriage. When the husband drinks all the
money, hits the wife and leaves his wife and children. They don't
have the money to travel to a city where the family court is located
in order to resolve this problem. The process takes one, two or
three years before he is told to provide milk for his children.
We call the mother and father and tell them that he has to give
part of his salary to his wife and children and that he can't drink
too much anymore. We come to an agreement.
Workers in factories in the cities that were dismissed from their
job without reason and without severance benefits go to the jungle
in search of the guerrillas to resolve this problem. We send a note
to the administrator, boss or owner telling them they have to come
and talk with the guerrillas to resolve the problem. Some don't
come, but others do come and we listen to them. We don't always
believe the workers, we listen to the businessmen because maybe
the worker is lazy, or a drunk, or a liar, or irresponsible. We
resolve these kinds of problems for people who live in the country
and the cities. We do this in other regions of the country where
the guerrillas are.
Here in San Vicente del Caguan, when we created the Zona de Despeje,
the campesinos stopped the guerrillas in the street for solutions
to their problems. Now, people have to go to the Oficina de quejas
y reclamos (Office of Claims and Complaints) and we listen to
both sides of the problem. We didn't create this system now in the
Zona de Despeje, historically the FARC has done this where
the state has lacked a system of justice and where a majority of
people don't believe in the Colombian justice system. We are doing
it in the Zona de Despeje in an office. The people come and
the guerrillas listen to them and find a solution. It is not only
about money.
For example, who gets custody of the children when parents get separated?
If the mother is a prostitute, doesn't care about her children and
consumes drugs, then the care of the children is given to the father.
These are the types of problems we resolve. This office also resolves
problems concerning guerrillas when they are bad. For example, if
they go out and get drunk. Sometimes we make mistakes and we like
it when other people tell us where we failed.
Q. What will happen if the United States Congress authorizes
increased military aid to the Colombian Armed Forces and they launch
an offensive against the FARC here in southern Colombia?
A. I don't want to think about it. I don't want to think
about it. We have more faith in a peace process with dialogue. I
don't want to think about a war in this region of the country. The
war won't resolve Colombia's problems. Colombia has 18 million people
living in absolute poverty. These people don't have electricity,
water, jobs, land, education and healthcare. Another 18 million
Colombians are poor with a salary that doesn't cover all their necessities.
They live restricted lives. In many cases the mother, father and
one or two sons have to work to provide transport, housing and clothes.
We are 36 million Colombians living poorly out of a total of 40
million Colombians. Of the other four million Colombians, some are
rich and others have a good life working in industries, businesses
and farms. They have a solution to their problems of healthcare,
education, vacation, work and social benefits. Is the war going
to resolve these problems?
If this is about the narco-trafficker problem then you know where
the narco-traffickers are. For example, the governor of the department
of Cesar, Lucas, is a narco-trafficker and he is governor for the
second time. His brother is a senator in the National Congress and
is in alliance with the president of the Congressional Assembly,
Pomanico, who is being investigated for stealing $4.5 million from
congress. There is an alliance between narco-traffickers and common
politicians, both Liberals and Conservatives. Also, between paramilitaries
and the narco-traffickers, everybody knows this.
If you go to Barranquilla the people will tell you where the narco-traffickers
are. The police and the commanders of the army battalions and brigades
know this. Will the war waged against poor campesinos solve these
problems? The war won't resolve the problems for the hungry and
unemployed in Colombia.
Q. How will the FARC effectively implement its new political
front, the Bolivariano Movement, if its members remain anonymous?
A. The idea of the Bolivariano Movement is not ours, it doesn't
come from us. It was born with many Colombians 16 years ago when
the members of the Patriotic Union were assassinated. It was a legal
movement, a democratic movement that participated in the presidential,
congressional and municipal elections. And then they began to get
assassinated.
When the armed forces, police and paramilitaries began to kill the
members of the Patriotic Union they came to us and said, 'We want
to work with you, we like the FARC's policies. But because of this
they will kill
us.' They wanted to work with us, but alone. But the FARC said,
'No, you can't work alone. You have to work with your father, your
mother, your brother, your neighbor, your girlfriend, your wife,
your co-workers, and your classmates. You have to organize, because
if we are divided we can't win.'
But to work in secret? They are right. At this moment was born the
idea for the political movement. A political movement that works
to recover Colombian society in secret, a movement that's militant
and clandestine. There will be campesinos, students, workers, women
and intellectuals who will fight the political confrontation without
saying they belong to the Bolivariano Movement. They will not participate
in elections because there are no guarantees and conditions that
they will not be killed.
First we have to change many customs in this country, like the oligarchy
killing political contradictors. This is Colombian history. The
world doesn't know of another country where political contradictors
are killed like in Colombia. All of them since we gained independence
from Spain. They assassinated Sucre, they tried to assassinate Bolivar,
and they assassinated many leaders of the nineteenth century in
civil wars. They killed Rafael Uribe Uribe. They assassinated Jorge
Eliecer Gaitan, Jaime Pardo Leal, and the Liberal guerrillas that
laid down their arms under the government of the dictator Rojas
Pinilla. They assassinated 4,000 members of the Patriotic Union,
cleansed the Patriotic Union with bullets, and they have followed
this practice to kill labor leaders, student leaders, campesino
leaders, everybody that has opposed this tyrannic regime. For this
reason the Bolivariano Movement remains clandestine.
Q. Many international human rights organizations have
demanded that the FARC stop recruiting children. Where does the
FARC stand on this issue?
A. In our statutes we have decided that we can recruit 15
year-olds and up. In some fronts there may have been some younger,
but a short time ago we decided to send them back home. But what
is the cost? In the last year a girl arrived at the office in San
Vicente, 14 years-old and wanting to join the guerrillas. When the
mother found out that she had joined she contacted the guerrillas
and cried and said her daughter is only 14 years-old. In March she
was sent back home because the FARC's Central Command said they
would return to their parents all those younger than fifteen. Two
weeks ago I met this girl and asked her what she was doing. She
said she was working in a bar from 6pm until sunrise. I asked what
she was doing in this bar and she said, 'I attend to the customers.'
When I asked in what way does she attend to the customers, she lowered
her head and started to cry. She is a whore. She is 14 years old.
A child prostitute. She was better in the guerrillas. In the guerrillas
we have dignity, respect and we provide them with clothes, food
and education.
And there are millions of others like this girl in Colombia that
are exploited in the coal mines, the gold mines, the emerald mines,
in the coca and poppy fields. They prefer that children work in
the coca and poppy fields because they pay them less and they work
more. It sounds beautiful when you say that children shouldn't be
guerrillas, but the children are in the streets of the cities doing
drugs, inhaling gasoline and glue. They are highly exploited.
According to the United Nations: 41% of Colombians are children;
6.5 million children live in conditions of poverty, add to this
1.2 million children living in absolute poverty; 30,000 children
live in the streets without mothers, fathers and brothers; 47% of
children are abused by their parents; and 2.5 million work in high
risk jobs. These children meet the guerrillas and they don't have
parents because the military or the paramilitaries
killed them and they ask the guerrillas to let them join. We are
executing the norm that no children younger than 15 years of age
join.
Q. How many women are there in the FARC and what happens
when they become pregnant?
A. Aproximately 30% of the guerrillas are women and the number
is increasing all the time. The women guerillas are treated the
same as the men. Some FARC units have female commandantes and the
FARC office in San Vicente is run by a female guerrilla named Nora.
Some of the women have relationships with male guerrillas and we
provide contraceptives because we do not want pregnant women in
the guerrillas. But some do get pregnant and if they don't have
an abortion it is necessary that they leave the guerrillas.
Q. What does the government have to do for the FARC to
agree to a cease-fire during negotiations?
A. Stop the fighting on both sides. This cease-fire must
be established for a specific time: a month or two months. And besides,
it must be verified for both sides. This we understand to be a cease-fire.
It was tried many times. Seventeen years ago with Belasario Betancur's
government, when we signed a cease-fire Manuel Marulanda Velez gave
the order to all guerrilla fronts to suspend fighting on May 28,
1984, and the president did the same. But the next day, there was
an opposing order from the Commander of the Army, General Vega Uribe,
saying they won't comply with the cease-fire order because they
have to abide by the Constitution.
We have many times during this presidential period called unilateral
cease-fires for Christmas, Easter, elections, many times. The most
recent unilateral cease-fire was December 20, 1999 until January
5, 2000. But if we are going to discuss this theme it would be under
bilateral proposals with defined times and mechanisms of control
and verification. To verify who broke the agreement and why.
This article originally appeared
in Colombia Report, an online journal
that was published by the Information Network of the Americas (INOTA).
Back to Top .
Comments
Copyright © 2003 Colombia
Journal. All rights reserved.
|