|
March 24, 2003
Worthy and Unworthy Victims in Colombia's War
of Terror
by Doug Stokes
In the narratives of the world's global media corporations, familiar
themes can be traced. One such theme that occurs time and again
is the designation of worthy victims; poor unfortunates caught up
in a spiral of violence. Invisible, however, are the unworthy victims;
those poor unfortunates who have also been caught up in a spiral
of violence, but due to the fact that their deaths do not lend weight
to the narratives of the powerful, can be ignored. An example would
be the Kurds in Northern Iraq. Worthy victims as long as their terrible
suffering under Saddam suits the interests of the powerful. Meanwhile,
their brothers and sisters across the border in Turkey are unworthy
victims whose suffering is not only ignored by the powerful, but
massively amplified by the flow of western arms to the Turkish government
for use in its war against the country's Kurdish minority. This
familiar pattern of worthy and unworthy victims is now being played
out in Colombia, the world's third largest recipient of U.S. military
aid and Washington's latest ally in its war of terror.
On
February 7, a car bomb exploded at El Nogal, one of Colombia's elite
clubs for the mega-rich. According to authorities, the bomb that
devastated the building and killed 37 people was planted by the
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), Latin America's largest
and oldest guerrilla movement, although the rebel group recently
denied responsibility for the bombing. While the death of these
people has been rightly condemned, their deaths are also being weaved
into a powerful narrative of worthy victims that justifies plans
to further militarize Colombia and increase the bloodshed for the
country's unnamed and unacknowledged unworthy victims: the poor
and the displaced. Colombian President Alvaro Uribe's immediate
response to the bombing was to call for more U.S. military aid to
fight the FARC. He stated bluntly, "Nations shouldn't ask Colombia
to tolerate terrorism while the UN is deciding the matter of Iraq."
Uribe has also promised to carry out far reaching proposals to
strengthen the longstanding U.S.-backed war of terror in Colombia
by committing his administration to double the size of the Colombian
military and create a new network of one million civilian informers
to perform a counter-intelligence role. Prior to the El Nogal bombing
Uribe had declared a state of "internal commotion" that
allowed the Colombian state to prohibit public rallies and impose
curfews. Fernando Londoño, Colombian Interior and Justice
minister explained, "We all have to be aware that terror leads
to extreme instability in Colombia. For this reason, the government
has decided to declare a state of internal commotion."
On September 10, 2002, Uribe also passed his first military decree
that has allowed for the creation of militarized Rehabilitation
and Consolidation Zones. In these zones, direct military rule replaced
existing local government rule and military forces were authorized
to carry out arrests and conduct searches without warrants until
Colombia's Constitutional Court ruled such activities unconstitutional
on November 26 (see, Colombia Court Rules
Rehabilitation Zones Unconstitutional).
Uribe is also pushing for tighter control of the Colombian media
by passing laws which seek to restrict reporting on Colombia's "counter
terrorist measures" with sentences of eight to twelve years
in prison for anyone who publishes statistics considered "counterproductive
to the fight against terrorism," as well as the possible "suspension"
of the media outlet in question. These sanctions will apply to anybody
who divulges, "reports that could hamper the effective implementation
of military or police operations, endanger the lives of public forces
personnel or private individuals," or commit other acts that
undermine public order, "while boosting the position or image
of the enemy." The innocent civilians caught up in the El Nogal
bomb therefore have been added to a narrative of worthy victims
that in turn lends further legitimacy for Uribe's new national security
strategy.
But what of the unworthy victims? Colombia's military has one of
the worst human rights records in the Western Hemisphere and has
well documented and long standing ties to the United Self-Defense
Forces of Colombia (AUC), a paramilitary group headed by Carlos
Castaño. Although the AUC has sought to cast itself as an
independent political actor, the U.S. State Department notes that
the AUC is "a mercenary vigilante force, financed by criminal
activities" and is the "the paid private" army of
"narcotics traffickers or large landowners."
The collusion between the Colombian military and these private
armies has led the human rights group Colombia Commission for Justice
and Peace to label Colombian military and paramilitary forces "parastate"
forces so as to diminish the alleged separation between these armed
actors. This in turn is largely to counter the "triangulation"
of Colombian violence that is regularly portrayed in mainstream
international media, which portrays the Colombian military as a
neutral arbiter between the armed left (the FARC) and the armed
right (the AUC), when in fact the Colombian military and paramilitaries
are two sides of the same counterinsurgency coin.
These parastate forces are responsible for over 80 percent of all
human rights abuses in Colombia. In the last fifteen years, an entire
democratic leftist political party was eliminated by right-wing
paramilitaries. Some 4,000 activists were murdered in the 1980s
and over 8,000 political assassinations were committed in Colombia
in 2002 with 80 percent of these murders committed by paramilitary
groups. Three out of four trade union activists murdered worldwide
are killed by the Colombian paramilitaries, while 2.7 million people
have been forcibly displaced from their homes.
According to the UN, lecturers and teachers are "among the
workers most often affected by killings, threats and violence-related
displacement." Paramilitary groups also regularly target human
rights activists, indigenous leaders, and community activists. This
repression serves to criminalize any form of civil society resistance
to the U.S.-led neo-liberal restructuring of Colombia's economy
and to stifle political and economic challenges to the Colombian
status quo. In defense of his paramilitary forces, Castaño
argues that we "have always proclaimed that we are the defenders
of business freedom and of the national and international industrial
sectors." Amidst this repression over half of Colombia's population
live in poverty according to the World Bank, with those most vulnerable
being "children of all ages."
Talks between Uribe's government and the AUC are ongoing with Justice
Minister Fernando Londoño stating that both sides "are
working very sincerely." A regional commander of the AUC declared,
"Uribe is like heaven compared to Pastrana." Gordon Sumner,
the Reagan administration's special envoy to Latin America, outlined
the best way to publicly incorporate the paramilitaries within the
new civilian "counter terrorist" networks: "First,
have them answer the law, cut out the drugs, and embrace human rights,"
then try to "bring them under the tent, to fight against the
guerrillas, who are the biggest threat." He went on to note
that in Colombia the "battle is never too crowded with friends."
Uribe's policies and his negotiations with the AUCwhich recognizes
them as a distinct political actorhave been endorsed by the
Bush administration. Colin Powell has broadly supported Uribe's
policies and argued that the United States is "firmly committed
to President Uribe and his new national security strategy,"
with the Bush administration working "with our Congress to
provide additional funding for Colombia."
Colombia's unworthy victims are the poor and displaced who are regularly
targeted by state and parastate forces. Their deaths are far more
numerous and far more dreadful due to the systematic manner in which
they are killed while being completely ignored by the world's mainstream
media. The El Nogal bombing, while terrible, is being used to influence
international opinion, which in turn will increase the suffering
of Colombia's "unworthy" victims and provide more U.S.
funding for Uribe's militarization of Colombia under the pretext
of Washington's global "war on terror."
Doug Stokes is an academic at Bristol University,
UK. His research is on the continuity of post-Cold War U.S. foreign
policy in the global South, in particular those policies that continue
to lead to large-scale civilian suffering. He has published extensively
on U.S. counterinsurgency in Latin America with a strong emphasis
on Colombia. Read more of his work at www.dougstokes.net
This article originally appeared
in Colombia Report, an online journal
that was published by the Information Network of the Americas (INOTA).
Back to Top .
Comments
Copyright © 2003 Colombia
Journal. All rights reserved.
|