|
June 2, 2003
Bush Places Corporate Interests Over Human Rights
by Garry Leech
The Bush White House is once again undermining international human
rights by trying to prevent foreign victims of abuses by U.S. corporations
from filing charges in U.S. courts. Among such cases currently being
addressed in U.S. Federal Courts are suits filed on behalf of Colombian
unions against Coca-Cola and Drummond Mining for using right-wing
paramilitary death squads to target union members in Colombia. The
Bush administration is claiming that such cases against multinational
corporations are hurting U.S. foreign policy and undermining the
war on terrorism. The White House is making it very clear that in
the eyes of the Bush administration the interests of corporate America
take precedence over individuals whose human rights have been violated
by U.S. companies.
For
more than 20 years, foreign victims of human rights abuses committed
by U.S. corporations operating overseas and brutal regimes allied
with the United States have been filing charges in U.S. Federal
Courts under the 1789 Alien Tort Claims Act. This statute allows
victims of human rights abuses to seek justice in the United States
for violations that occurred abroad.
The White House is now seeking to curtail the ability of foreign
nationals to seek justice in U.S. courts because some of these suits
target governments allied with Washington in the war against terrorism.
The Bush administration is also concerned with several recent suits
that have been filed against the United States government, including
one on behalf of prisoners detained at the U.S. military base in
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, following their capture in Afghanistan.
In May, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a 30-page brief in
the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a case brought by Burmese citizens
against the California-based Unocol Corporation. The brief calls
on the court to limit the ability of foreign citizens to seek justice
in U.S. courts for human rights violations committed abroad because
such lawsuits are harming U.S. foreign policy and undermining the
war on terror. The Burmese plaintiffs allege that during the building
of a $1.2 billion gas pipeline, Unocol and its partner in the project,
Burma's brutal military regime, are responsible for human rights
abuses committed against workers, including the use of forced labor.
Last year, in a similar case, the Bush administration asked a federal
court to dismiss charges brought against ExxonMobil for abuses in
Indonesia because the Indonesian government is an ally in the war
on terror. However, the new brief filed by the Justice Department
does not only seek to have the charges against Unocol dismissed,
it is an attempt to prevent any such cases ever being heard in U.S.
Federal Courts under the Alien Tort Claims Act.
Two Colombia-related Alien Tort Claims Act cases currently being
addressed by U.S. Federal Courts involve Drummond Mining and Coca-Cola.
In March 2002, SINTRAMIENERGETICA, the Colombian union that represents
workers at Alabama-based Drummond Mining's Colombian mines, filed
suit in Alabama charging that the company hired right-wing paramilitaries
to murder three union leaders. This case is still waiting to be
heard.
In July 2001, a suit was filed in Florida by the United Steelworkers
of America and the International Labor Rights Fund on behalf of
SINALTRAINALthe Colombian union that represents workers at
Coca-Cola's Colombian bottling plants; the estate of a murdered
union leader; and five other unionists who worked for Coca-Cola
and were threatened, kidnapped or tortured by right-wing paramilitaries
(see, Coca-Cola Accused of Using Death
Squads to Target Union Leaders). While the court dismissed the
charges against Coca-Cola, it has allowed the case against the multinational
company's Colombian bottlers to proceed. In the meantime, the plaintiffs
are appealing the dismissal of the charges against Coca-Cola.
If the Justice Department's attempt to redefine the Alien Tort
Claims Act is successful, cases such as the ongoing Coca-Cola and
Drummond suits will likely be dismissed. As a result, U.S. corporations
and governments allied with Washington will be able to continue
violating the human rights of people who have no chance of obtaining
justice in their homelands. Once again, the Bush administration
has made it clear that it intends to place the interests of U.S.
corporations over the human rights of innocent people. Additionally,
the Bush White House continues to use the war on terror as a justification
for furthering U.S. corporate interests at home and abroad.
This article originally appeared
in Colombia Report, an online journal
that was published by the Information Network of the Americas (INOTA).
Back to Top .
Comments
Copyright © 2003 Colombia
Journal. All rights reserved.
|