|
July 14, 2003
U.S. Policies Consistently Undermine Human Rights
by Garry Leech
On Tuesday, July 1, the Bush administration announced it was banning
military aid to some 50 countries because of their refusal to grant
U.S. citizens immunity from prosecution by the International Criminal
Court (ICC). President Bush signed waivers exempting 22 of these
countries from the aid ban, but Colombia was not one of them. While
it initially appears that such a ban would be catastrophic to a
country that is the third-largest recipient of U.S. military aid,
in reality it will have little effect on Colombia. The huge majority
of Colombia's military assistance actually falls under counternarcotics
programs and therefore is not affected by the aid ban. In fact,
Colombia was only scheduled to receive $98 million in military aid
in 2003 as part of the war on terror and most of it has already
been spent, leaving only $5 million frozen under the new aid ban.
Consequently, it was not necessary for the Bush administration to
issue a waiver in order to continue its support for the Colombian
military. Washington's response to ICC signatory countries such
as Colombia that refuse to exempt U.S. citizens is consistent with
other Bush administration policies that also undermine human rights.
One
week after the military aid ban was announced, the Bush administration
certified that the Colombian government had met U.S. Congress-imposed
human rights requirements in order to continue receiving U.S. military
assistance for counternarcotics programs (Note: U.S. counterterrorism
aid to Colombia is not subject to the human rights conditions imposed
by Congress on drug war aid). However, international human rights
groups claim there is compelling evidence that Colombia failed to
meet six of the seven requirements set by Congress, including the
Uribe administration's failure to sever links between the Colombian
Armed Forces and right-wing paramilitary groups.
According to José Miguel Vivanco, Executive Director of
the Americas Division of Human Rights Watch, The Bush administration
has consistently argued that it couldn't hold up aid to the Colombian
military over its collusion with human rights abusers. Now, it turns
out that they're perfectly willing to suspend aid, but only when
countries like Colombia resist granting immunity for possible crimes
against humanity. This sends a perverse signal about American priorities.
The Bush administration's policies are nothing if not consistent
with regards to human rights in Colombia. While the farcical certification
process allows the Colombian military to maintain its links to right-wing
paramilitary death squads with impunity, the White House's decision
to suspend military aid is intended to pressure Colombia into providing
U.S. personnel operating in Colombia with immunity from the ICC.
The military aid cut-off will have little effect on this year's
funding, but it could affect next year's counterterrorism aid intended
to protect the Caño Limon oil pipelinepartly-owned
by Los Angeles-based Occidental Petroleumin eastern Colombia's
Arauca department.
The next fiscal year, however, does not begin until October, which
gives Washington and Bogotá three months to settle the ICC
issue. In fact, Colombian President Alvaro Uribe is already claiming
that a 1962 bilateral agreement between Colombia and the United
States provides immunity to U.S. citizens working for the U.S. government
in Colombia. But the Bush administration wants a more comprehensive
agreement that exempts all U.S. citizens, whether they work for
the government or not, from prosecution before the ICC.
This discrepancy between Washington and Bogotá about the
degree of immunity U.S. citizens should receive will likely affect
the Bush administration's decision regarding the Colombian government's
recent request that three U.S. citizens be extradited to Colombia.
In December 1998, a Colombian military helicopter dropped a U.S.-made
cluster bomb on the village of Santo Domingo in eastern Colombia
killing 18 civilians, including seven children. Colombian investigators
have obtained evidence that the U.S. crew members of a plane belonging
to Florida-based AirScan Inc. aided the Colombian military in its
battle against nearby guerrilla fighters and provided the coordinates
for the fatal bombing. AirScan is a private security company contracted
to protect Occidental Petroleum's interests by providing aerial
surveillance of the Caño Limon oil pipeline, which is regularly
bombed by leftist rebels.
There has been no immediate response from the Bush administration
to the Colombian attorney general's request that the AirScan crewArthur
McClintock, Jose Orta and Charlie Dennybe handed over to Colombian
authorities for questioning about the bombing incident. It is unlikely
that the White House will authorize the extradition of the three
U.S. citizens without a guarantee of immunity for their role in
the bombing despite the fact that Colombia routinely extradites
Colombian nationals to the United States for drug trafficking, including
64 suspects over the past year. The Santo Domingo bombing case illustrates
why the Bush White House is so eager to pressure the Colombian government
into guaranteeing immunity to all U.S. citizens operating in Colombia,
not only those working for the government.
The Bush administration's human rights policies towards Colombia
have proven to be remarkably consistent and in line with its global
policies: immunity for all those receiving U.S. aid and assistance
in order to protect U.S. interests. While pressuring governments
around the world to sign bilateral agreements that exempt U.S. citizens
from the ICC for fear of politically-motivated prosecutions of U.S.
military and civilian personnel, Washington continues to implement
its own politically-motivated human rights policies. Instead of
creating a permanent international court such as the ICC, the Bush
administration would prefer to continue the strategy of establishing
temporary tribunals that only prosecute enemies of the United States.
Recent examples of such tribunals include the NATO trial of Slobodan
Milosevic and his fellow Serbian henchmen and the U.S. tribunals
for Afghans accused of terrorism.
Last year, President Bush removed the U.S. signature from the ICC
treaty, which had been signed by former President Bill Clinton as
one of his final acts before leaving office. This decision by the
Bush administration clearly illustrated that Washington would only
tolerate politically-motivated prosecutions that serve U.S. interests.
By certifying that Colombia's human rights-violating armed forces
can continue receiving military assistance for counternarcotics
operations and by insisting that U.S. military and civilian personnel
be provided immunity from the ICC, the Bush administration has once
again undermined international human rights efforts.
This article originally appeared
in Colombia Report, an online journal
that was published by the Information Network of the Americas (INOTA).
Back to Top .
Comments
Copyright © 2003 Colombia
Journal. All rights reserved.
|