|
March 1, 2004
(Un)Democratic (In)Security in Caquetá
by Garry Leech
While President Alvaro Uribe's democratic security agenda may be
providing increased security for some of Colombia's urban population,
it has massively destabilized many rural communities. This has been
clearly illustrated by the Colombian Army's ongoing offensive in
the southeastern department of Caquetá. These operations
have not only failed to provide additional security, they have actually
dramatically escalated the levels of violence in the region, instilled
fear in the local population and led to massive displacement. Additionally,
the mainstream media has once again dutifully reported the army's
version of events in Caquetá.
In
January, the Colombian Army's 12th Brigade launched Operation New
Year, intended to seize control of rural zones in Caquetá
controlled by Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) guerrillas.
The first targets were the remote villages of San Isidro and La
Unión Peneya. Troops under cover of darkness arrived in Blackhawk
helicopters, armored personnel carriers and armored cars. According
to the 12th Brigade's Major Edgar Ortega, the operation led to the
capture of 27 FARC militia members and the seizure of weapons, communications
equipment and rebel propaganda, including CD disks of “communist
music.”
Operation New Year is the latest operation being conducted by the
Colombian military as part of Uribe's “democratic security”
program. However, the military's tactics in Caquetá have
clearly been undemocratic—resulting in mass arrests of presumed
guerrilla collaborators—and have caused instability throughout
the region with hundreds of residents fleeing the army's pending
arrival in La Unión Peneya.
Those displaced by the army's offensive fled to surrounding villages
and towns. In one such village, a FARC militia member explains that
the community simply does not have the resources to support the
displaced that have arrived there. He notes that the economic situation
has long made it difficult for peasants to survive and now the escalating
violence is causing some to abandon the region.
Operation New Year is targeting the FARC's 15th Front, which has
some 250 uniformed fighters, and the Teofilo Forero Mobil Column,
whose 250 guerrillas operate throughout Caquetá. In addition
to these forces, there are a handful of FARC militia members living
in most of the region's remote villages. These fighters often wear
civilian clothing while maintaining security in the villages, providing
intelligence to the 15th Front and participating in local operations.
Peasants in rural Caquetá have become accustomed to governmental
neglect and to living under FARC rule. Most villages are not linked
to the national electricity grid and lack running water, and while
some can be accessed by four-wheel drive vehicles via bumpy unpaved
roads, the majority can only be reached on foot or horseback. For
many local residents, the military is the only branch of the national
government with which they have contact. Two children in a village
not far from La Unión Peneya describe how a recent fishing
trip to the local river was disrupted by Colombian military aircraft
machine-gunning and bombing nearby.
This region has also endured repeated aerial fumigation of the
coca crops that many farmers cultivate to supplement the mediocre
income they earn from legal crops. The United States launched a
new round of spraying in February that coincided with Operation
New Year. According to one local farmer, “The fumigation has
made life difficult for people because it has destroyed food crops
and harmed animals.” Not surprisingly, fear of the military
and years of government neglect have left the local population distrustful
of the state.
While
the FARC and many peasants hold the government responsible for the
dire economic conditions fueling the country's civil conflict, the
army's Major Ortega believes otherwise: “Colombia's problem
is not poverty; Ecuador and Peru are poorer than Colombia and they
don't have these problems. Nor is narco-trafficking Colombia's problem;
Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru also have narco-trafficking. The problem
is authority. We haven't had real leadership until now. We haven't
had security until now.” However, despite Ortega's blatant
endorsement of Uribe's security agenda and the 12th Brigade's attempts
to implement it in rural Caquetá, the military offensive
has dramatically reduced the level of security for much of the local
population. In fact, operations like the one in Caquetá only
affirm peasants' fear of the military and distrust of the state.
Many medium-sized towns situated along Caquetá's only major
highway have long had a nominal state presence. However, their recent
experiences illustrate the almost single-minded, militaristic focus
of the Uribe government. While many of these towns are now heavily-guarded
by the Colombian army, including soldiers from the peasant soldier
program, there is clearly a lack of social and economic investment.
In El Paujil, one of the nearest government-controlled towns to
San Isidro and La Unión Peneya, a 2002 FARC rocket intended
for the police station hit the local hospital instead. According
to El Paujil's secretary of local government, Oscar Ochoa, the town
cannot afford the $160,000 cost of building a new hospital. Ochoa
claims, “The [national] government won't subsidize the cost
of the new hospital and the town can't get a loan.” The government
is, however, providing massive funding for the Colombian military,
mostly subsidized with U.S. taxpayer money. With a huge majority
of the $700 million that the Bush administration is sending to Colombia
annually going to the military, there is little left over for building
hospitals and other social and economic necessities.
Additionally, while towns like El Paujil have gained a certain
measure of security by maintaining a permanent military presence,
some of them have also seen an increase in right-wing paramilitary
activity. The Uribe administration's security agenda has allowed
paramilitaries to continue their dirty war against suspected subversives,
a categorization that includes unionists, human rights workers and
community leaders. In other words, Uribe's security program is selective
in nature, protecting only those not critical of the government's
security and economic policies.
Fully aware of what has occurred in these towns, and already skeptical
of the state, peasants in rural Caquetá are afraid that the
arrival of the military in their villages will also fail to bring
a corresponding social investment. Even worse, they fear the army
will open the door to paramilitaries who will inevitably view many
of these peasants who have long lived under guerrilla rule as military
targets.
While the mainstream media has repeatedly criticized the guerrillas—and
in many cases rightfully so—it often acts as nothing but a
mouthpiece for the U.S. and Colombian governments. Soon after it
secured La Unión Peneya, the 12th Brigade brought in the
national and international media—albeit, only mainstream media—who
dutifully reported the army's version of events. None ventured beyond
the virtually abandoned La Unión Peneya to find out how residents
of other soon-to-be-targeted villages felt about the army's offensive
or Uribe's security agenda. Without telephones, these peasants are
also never included in the polls touting Uribe's 70 percent approval
rating.
Also, despite the army's notorious history of falsifying battlefield
reports, including exaggerating body counts and even dressing dead
civilians in rebel uniforms, the mainstream press brought into view
La Unión Peneya failed to ask any questions about why the
guerrillas would leave behind all that weaponry and communications
equipment when they knew about the military offensive more than
two weeks in advance. Nor, when the army faced no resistance, was
there any question about how the military knew that those arrested,
who were all dressed in civilian clothing, were in fact FARC guerrillas.
When I asked Major Ortega how the army can determine whether or
not men clad in civilian clothing are guerrillas, he responded,
“They have pistols tucked in their waistbands and they also
have walkie-talkies.” Therefore, one has to assume that, despite
knowing well in advance that the army was coming, FARC militia members
idiotically waited with guns tucked in their trousers and walkie-talkies
in their hands for the military to come and arrest them.
Most mainstream media correspondents in Colombia (with the partial
exception of the Washington Post’s Scott Wilson)
appear to view their journalistic responsibility in much the same
way as New York Times reporter Judith Miller. When asked
why her articles leading up to the war in Iraq often did not include
the views of experts skeptical of the Bush administration's weapons
of mass destruction claims, Miller shockingly replied: “My
job isn't to assess the government's information and be an independent
intelligence analyst myself. My job is to tell readers of The
New York Times what the government thought of Iraq's arsenal.”
In other words, she doesn't believe she has a responsibility to
be an investigative journalist, only to serve as a mouthpiece for
the U.S. government. This same attitude permeates U.S. and Colombian
mainstream media coverage of Colombia's civil conflict, particularly
when journalists repeatedly depend on U.S. embassy and Colombian
military press junkets to report alleged drug war and civil war
successes in remote rural zones.
Meanwhile, peasants throughout Caquetá continue to be targeted,
whether they are victims of FARC attacks on government-controlled
towns or military attacks in rebel-dominated territory. Many of
those living in villages near San Isidro and La Unión Peneya
are now waiting to see if they will be next on Operation New Year's
target list. They are wondering when the armored unit temporarily
based in El Paujil will receive its orders to roll. When that happens,
these peasants will also have to decide whether to flee or risk
being arrested as “subversives.” And when this happens,
no doubt the mainstream media will dutifully report how President
Uribe is providing security throughout Colombia. The victims of
Operation New Year, however, are quickly learning that this security
is not for everyone.
Back to Top .
Comments
The
views expressed in this article are that of the author
and may not reflect the views of Colombia Journal.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Colombia Journal. All rights
reserved.
|
|