|
July 19, 2004
Resisting Water Privatization in Bogotá
by Sarah Garland
When it loaned $145 million to Bogotá in 1996 to help salvage
the Colombian capital’s struggling public water company, the
World Bank hoped the city would eventually succumb to its demands
to privatize the utility company. But Bogotá hasn’t
budged. Instead, the Water and Sewerage Company of Bogotá
(EAAB) has remained in public hands and become one of the most efficient,
profitable and equitable water utilities in Colombia.
In
the early 1990s, the company faced the seemingly impossible task
of delivering water and sewage services to a burgeoning population
that was increasing by an average of 150,000 a year. In 1993, the
homes of only 78 percent of its then-nearly five million residents
were connected to water services and 71 percent to sewage services.
By 2001, Bogotá’s population had grown to nearly 6.5
million as people fleeing rural poverty and civil conflict migrated
to the city. Despite this growth, the EAAB raised the proportion
of households with potable water to 95 percent and those with sewerage
to 87 percent. EAAB achieved this by implementing reforms in the
late 1990s that restructured the company’s management—previously
crippled by cronyism and incompetence—and provided subsidies
for poor residents.
Voters ensured Bogotá’s water company remained public
by electing a series of progressive mayors who resisted the privatization
trend. Mayor Enrique Peñalosa (1998-2000), who took advantage
of a 1994 law granting mayors more authority and independence in
the management of public services, focused on providing services
to the city’s poorest neighborhoods. Peñalosa’s
administration connected 415 neighborhoods to sewage service and
supplied potable water to 350,000 additional urbanites.
By 2001, city spending on public works in Bogotá’s
low-income areas constituted 40 percent of Colombia’s overall
water sector investment. In 2002, the country’s National Planning
Commission rated the EAAB as the best utility in Colombia for providing
water and sewerage coverage—Cartagena’s private water
company ranked a distant fourth and Barranquilla’s even lower.
Earlier this year, the Duff and Phelps international credit rating
company gave the EAAB its second highest rating of AA+ for the second
consecutive year.
Bogotá’s lower- and middle-class residents have benefited
from heavily subsidized water service, partially financed by the
city’s wealthy who sometimes pay double the real cost of their
water. But new laws require that, by 2005, only the city’s
poorest residents receive EAAB subsidies, which will be significantly
lower than those provided presently. Still, Mayor Luis Eduardo Garzón
recently promised to lower water rates by up to 10 percent without
reducing the EAAB’s reinvestment into the system. However,
his proposals probably require a reduction in pension funds for
EAAB workers.
While providing water and sewerage to the rapidly expanding city,
the EAAB has also been implementing initiatives to conserve water
and protect the environment. Campaigns to reduce water consumption
have lowered the average daily consumption rate from 42 gallons
per person in 1990 to 29 gallons per person today, less than a fifth
of the consumption rate in the United States. The EAAB has also
launched several projects to protect nearby wetlands that provide
most of the city’s water. With the EAAB assuring that water
and sewage service will reach 100 percent of the city’s residents
by 2010, Bogotá appears poised to protect its water as a
public asset. Despite the EAAB’s numerous successes, however,
the World Bank continues to pressure Bogotá into privatizing
its water company.
Sarah Garland is an Editorial Assistant at
the North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA). This article
previously appeared in NACLA
Report on the Americas.
Back to Top .
Comments
The
views expressed in this article are that of the author
and may not reflect the views of Colombia Journal.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Colombia Journal. All rights
reserved.
|
|