|
March 6, 2008
FARC Leader’s Killing Sabotages Prisoner Exchange
by Garry Leech
Colombia’s President Alvaro Uribe has done everything possible
over the past six months to sabotage any possibility of a prisoner
exchange between his government and the country’s largest
leftist guerrilla group, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia
(FARC). With the killing of FARC leader Raúl Reyes on March
1, he has likely finally succeeded. According to Colombian intelligence
officials, it was a satellite telephone call from Venezuela’s
President Hugo Chávez to Reyes that revealed the FARC commander’s
whereabouts. Chávez made the call to Reyes to thank the rebel
commander for releasing the four congresspersons that the FARC had
turned over to representatives of the Venezuelan government earlier
that day. The fact that Colombia’s President Uribe decided
to exploit a unilateral humanitarian gesture by the FARC and kill
the rebel group’s second-in-command likely ensures that the
guerrillas will no longer consider a prisoner exchange.
Ever since he assumed the presidency, Uribe has been reluctant
to engage in any negotiations with the FARC, even prisoner exchange
talks, for fear of lending political legitimacy to the guerrilla
group. However, Chávez’s successes in obtaining the
unilateral release of six FARC captives in little more than a month
had left many Colombians—particularly the loved ones of those
being held by the rebels—feeling cautiously optimistic that
a prisoner exchange could in fact be negotiated. Following the latest
handover of captives, according to a senior Colombian military officer,
“Chávez was thrilled by the release of the hostages
and called Reyes to tell him that everything went well.” That
phone call provided the Colombian president with the opportunity
he needed to sabotage any possibility of a prisoner exchange once
and for all.
In July 2007, Uribe had reluctantly bowed to increasing public
pressure demanding that his government negotiate the release of
those held captive by the FARC. He asked Colombian Senator Piedad
Córdoba and Chávez to act as mediators between his
Colombian government and the FARC. The Colombian right quickly began
criticizing Uribe for providing Chávez with a platform to
increase his visibility and legitimacy among Colombians.
Uribe responded to the pressure being placed on him by his own
supporters and began making unilateral declarations that clearly
illustrated his unwillingness to allow any serious talks to even
get off the ground. Uribe made it clear that he was going to do
everything possible to ensure that Chávez and FARC negotiators
could not meet face to face. The Colombian president refused to
guarantee safe passage to FARC leaders so they could meet with Chávez
in Venezuela.
When it was initially rumored that the FARC’s second-in-command
Reyes, would travel to Caracas to meet with Chávez, Uribe
make it clear that the guerrilla leader would have to find his own
way to Venezuela and that he would be arrested by Colombia’s
security forces if they were to encounter him. When Chávez
then said that he would be willing to travel to the jungles of Colombia
to meet with the FARC’s supreme commander Manuel Marulanda,
Uribe immediately ruled out any such meeting on Colombian soil.
The Venezuelan president then suggested that Marulanda come to
Caracas to discuss a prisoner exchange, and perhaps even lay the
foundation for future peace talks. Uribe again blocked a meeting
between the two people best positioned to reach an agreement by
announcing, “Manuel Marulanda sends messages that he can’t
attend meetings because if he comes out of hiding he’ll be
killed. Well, he guesses correctly.” The Colombian president
then declared that the only people Marulanda “has to meet
with are the judges and police, to respond for 40 years of killing
and other crimes.”
Nevertheless, despite Uribe’s clumsy attempts to prevent
Chávez and the FARC from meeting face-to-face, Ivan Marquez
of the rebel group’s central command made it to Caracas and
met with both the Venezuelan president and Córdoba. Not long
afterwards, Uribe announced that he was terminating Chávez’s
role as mediator and ended talks that had shown more promise of
success in three months than Colombia’s peace commissioner
had achieved in the previous five years.
Despite being “fired” by Uribe, Chávez continued
his efforts to convince the FARC to unilaterally release some of
its captives. In January 2008, the FARC released two Colombian lawmakers
to representatives of the Venezuelan government. On February 27,
the guerrillas handed over four more captives to Venezuela and that
afternoon Chávez made the fatal call to Reyes that was intercepted
by Colombian intelligence.
Not only did the Uribe government succeed in killing the FARC’s
principal negotiator, it also ensured that the efforts of the Ecuadorian
government to secure the release of FARC captives would also be
terminated. Following the Colombian military’s cross-border
strike against Reyes’s camp, Ecuador’s President Rafael
Correa announced that his government had been in talks with the
FARC to obtain the release of some of the captives. However, the
killing of the FARC commander had ruined any chance of freeing those
captives. “I’m sorry to inform you that the talks were
rather advanced to liberate 12 hostages, among them Ingrid Betancourt,
in Ecuador,” said Correa.
By cynically taking military advantage of a satellite phone call
directly related to a process that had liberated six Colombians
held captive by the FARC for years, Uribe has likely ensured that
the guerrilla group will not re-engage in talks anytime soon. After
all, the FARC has little reason to trust the Colombian president
given that he has made clear his willingness to exploit humanitarian
efforts in order to assassinate FARC leaders. Sadly, Uribe’s
decision to kill a FARC commander who has already been replaced
has ensured that the relatives of those Colombians still being held
captive by the guerrillas will not see their loved ones for a very,
very long time—if ever.
Back to Top .
Comments
The
views expressed in this article are that of the author
and may not reflect the views of Colombia Journal.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Colombia Journal. All rights
reserved.
|
|