|
February 12, 2000
Colombia's Forgotten Refugees
by Garry Leech
During 1999 we were inundated with news coverage of civilians fleeing
state-sponsored violence in Kosovo and East Timor. For weeks our
television screens were filled with the images of some one million
Kosovar Albanians seeking refuge from the Serbian army and pro-Serb
militias. We watched in horror as pro-Indonesian paramilitaries
slaughtered East Timorese civilians who dared to remain in their
homes. But what about Colombia? Where are the nightly news reports
on the plight of the 1.7 million Colombians that have been displaced
by that country's ongoing civil war?
The number of Colombians displaced by the war between the Colombian
army and leftist guerrillas far exceeds the number of refugees in
East Timor. It even exceeds the number of Kosovar Albanians forced
to flee Serb repression. And yet, in spite of the fact that Colombian
refugees currently constitute the third largest displaced population
in the world, behind only the Sudanese and Angolans, their plight
receives little attention from the mainstream media.
In 1999, more than 288,000 Colombians fled their homes as a result
of the fighting, bringing the total to more than 1.7 million since
1985. Some of these refugees are currently living in temporary camps
established by aid organizations, however, the huge majority are
forced to fend for themselves. Entire peasant families have abandoned
their rural homes for a life of poverty in the burgeoning slums
of Colombia's cities, others have fled
to neighboring countries, and ever-increasing numbers are seeking
refuge illegally in the United States.
The reason for their displacement is not dissimilar to what occurred
in the Kosovo and East Timor conflicts: a civil war in which brutal
pro-government paramilitaries, closely allied with the military,
target the civilian population. According to Human Rights Watch,
paramilitaries are responsible for 78 percent of the human rights
violations in Colombia. These paramilitaries work closely with the
Colombian army, which in turn is receiving ever-increasing levels
of U.S. military aid. It is these paramilitary forces that are primarily
responsible for the ongoing displacement of civilians from their
homes.
In order to undermine the principal base of guerrilla support--the
peasant population--the Colombian army and its paramilitary allies
have implemented U.S.-inspired counterinsurgency tactics that aim
to "eliminate the fish by draining the sea." This goal
is achieved through massacres, disappearances and, as a result of
the terror instilled by such tactics, a mass exodus of the peasant
population from the targeted region.
The Clinton Administration continues to focus on a military solution
to the conflict which is evident in the huge $1.3 billion aid proposal
for Colombia--already the third largest recipient of U.S. aid behind
Israel and Egypt--with more than 80 percent of it earmarked to the
Colombian military and security forces. The Clinton Administration,
which rarely acknowledges the Colombian refugee crisis, has recently
received a request from a bipartisan group in Congress to provide
Temporary Protective Status for Colombians who have fled, and continue
to flee, their homeland. Temporary Protective Status would allow
60,000 to 80,000 Colombians to live and work in the United States
for up to 18 months. However, approval is far from guaranteed.
Historically, the U.S. has been slow to grant asylum to refugees
fleeing countries whose governments were closely allied to the United
States. For most of the 1980s less than 2 percent of Salvadoran
and Guatemalan refugees were granted political asylum in spite of
the fact that tens of thousands of civilians were being slaughtered
by their own government. It was felt that granting asylum to these
refugees would be an acknowledgement of the repression practiced
by the U.S.-supported governments. Using Cold War logic, if the
repression isn't acknowledged, then it doesn't exist. At the same
time, the Reagan Administration maintained a virtual open door policy
for Cuban refugees whose lives were rarely at risk in Fidel Castro's
Cuba. Hence, the repression is acknowledged, therefore it must exist.
It appears that U.S. policy today continues to function under the
same guidelines. It was easy, and convenient, to vilify Yugoslav
President Slobodan Milosevic and his Serb forces whilst commiserating
with the defenseless Kosovar refugees. In East Timor the notoriously
repressive Indonesian military, a dispensable former Cold War ally,
was an easy target for Clinton Administration sanctions whilst we
sympathized with the plight of the displaced East Timorese. However,
Colombia falls into a different category than Kosovo and East Timor.
As was the case in El Salvador and Guatemala, an official acknowledgement
of the refugee problem would more than likely illuminate its cause:
that the paramilitaries primarily responsible for Colombia's refugee
and human rights crisis are closely allied with a military we are
actively supporting.
For its part, the European Union approved $7 million in funding
to help establish new communities for the displaced in Colombia.
Although it's a step in the right direction, this amount is far
too small to cope with a problem that, especially in light of increasing
U.S. military aid to Colombia, will inevitably worsen.
In the meantime, the plight of the Colombian refugees, unlike their
counterparts in Kosovo and East Timor, will continue to go unnoticed.
It appears that as long as U.S. policymakers refuse to acknowledge
the Colombian refugee problem, so will the mainstream media. And
therefore, the problem doesn't exist.
This article originally appeared
in Colombia Report, an online journal
that was published by the Information Network of the Americas (INOTA).
Back to Top .
Comments
Copyright © 2003 Colombia
Journal. All rights reserved.
|